I'm thrilled by this decision. I think it could make a huge difference. I think many government agencies overstepped their bounds during covid. In fact they acted in a concerted way to promote "vaccine" profits. But what I don't understand is—what determines which policies or interpretations are going to be given a look by the judicial branch?
That will depend upon how many lawsuits are filed to challenge them. The court can only review what is before it in "cases or controversies." So that's why we need our supporters to help us file as many lawsuits as possible! You can make a tax-deductible gift to our nonprofit organization at https://wethepatriotsusa.org/donate/.
This decision was much needed but I'm skeptical that many agencies will respect it until forced to do so by more court rulings. Giving up power, even illegitimate power, does not come naturally to professional bureaucrats. Even so, it's still an important ruling. Maybe there's hope!
I agree with the decision but I would say the Court isn't any more independent than bureaucracies are. Courts like bureaucracies can change their decisions when old court members die or retire and are replaced by new people appointed by a new POTUS. At least the makeup of the court doesn't change as frequently as bureaucracies do and bureaucracies are politicized and heavily influenced by the funders of the agencies.
I'm thrilled by this decision. I think it could make a huge difference. I think many government agencies overstepped their bounds during covid. In fact they acted in a concerted way to promote "vaccine" profits. But what I don't understand is—what determines which policies or interpretations are going to be given a look by the judicial branch?
That will depend upon how many lawsuits are filed to challenge them. The court can only review what is before it in "cases or controversies." So that's why we need our supporters to help us file as many lawsuits as possible! You can make a tax-deductible gift to our nonprofit organization at https://wethepatriotsusa.org/donate/.
This decision was much needed but I'm skeptical that many agencies will respect it until forced to do so by more court rulings. Giving up power, even illegitimate power, does not come naturally to professional bureaucrats. Even so, it's still an important ruling. Maybe there's hope!
I agree with the decision but I would say the Court isn't any more independent than bureaucracies are. Courts like bureaucracies can change their decisions when old court members die or retire and are replaced by new people appointed by a new POTUS. At least the makeup of the court doesn't change as frequently as bureaucracies do and bureaucracies are politicized and heavily influenced by the funders of the agencies.